<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 731 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283911</link>
    <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision refusing to order en masse cancellation of CBI constable selections where only limited irregularities were found. The Court held that absent categorical, pervasive proof that the entire process was vitiated, it was unlawful and disproportionate to annul all appointments; cancelling all despite infirmity affecting only a small number of selectees was irrational. The HC&#039;s pragmatic remedy protecting unaffected selectees was endorsed, and the appeal challenging that judgment was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 731 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283911</link>
      <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision refusing to order en masse cancellation of CBI constable selections where only limited irregularities were found. The Court held that absent categorical, pervasive proof that the entire process was vitiated, it was unlawful and disproportionate to annul all appointments; cancelling all despite infirmity affecting only a small number of selectees was irrational. The HC&#039;s pragmatic remedy protecting unaffected selectees was endorsed, and the appeal challenging that judgment was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>