<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 784 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387300</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on the ground of low tax effect. The petition was not entertained, and the Court did not adjudicate the substantive merits of the tax controversy. The operative effect was a summary dismissal limited to the threshold consideration of tax effect, leaving the underlying tax issues undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 784 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387300</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on the ground of low tax effect. The petition was not entertained, and the Court did not adjudicate the substantive merits of the tax controversy. The operative effect was a summary dismissal limited to the threshold consideration of tax effect, leaving the underlying tax issues undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>