<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 779 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387295</link>
    <description>The High Court, in appeals challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding depreciation on fixed assets acquired under the Transfer Scheme 2003, remitted the matter for fresh assessment. The Court found that assets were not initially identifiable but became so in a subsequent year based on auditors&#039; report. It directed the assessing authority to reevaluate the depreciation claim within three months from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 779 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387295</link>
      <description>The High Court, in appeals challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding depreciation on fixed assets acquired under the Transfer Scheme 2003, remitted the matter for fresh assessment. The Court found that assets were not initially identifiable but became so in a subsequent year based on auditors&#039; report. It directed the assessing authority to reevaluate the depreciation claim within three months from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>