<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387291</link>
    <description>The appeal by Revenue was dismissed by the ITAT. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the quantum addition, the basis for the penalty, had been previously deleted by ITAT and upheld by the Delhi High Court. The ITAT also ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 14A and Section 40(a)(ia), citing relevant legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387291</link>
      <description>The appeal by Revenue was dismissed by the ITAT. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the quantum addition, the basis for the penalty, had been previously deleted by ITAT and upheld by the Delhi High Court. The ITAT also ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 14A and Section 40(a)(ia), citing relevant legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>