https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20143 The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, concluding that the allowance of a salary of Rs. 9,000 to the karta of a Hindu undivided family was not justified. The decision emphasized the importance of valid agreements, commercial expediency, and genuine payments in such cases, highlighting the need for clear evidence and justification for transactions involving family members in Hindu undivided families to avoid reducing tax liabilities through questionable salary payments. en-us Thu, 14 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:46:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20143 The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, concluding that the allowance of a salary of Rs. 9,000 to the karta of a Hindu undivided family was not justified. The decision emphasized the importance of valid agreements, commercial expediency, and genuine payments in such cases, highlighting the need for clear evidence and justification for transactions involving family members in Hindu undivided families to avoid reducing tax liabilities through questionable salary payments. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 14 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20143