https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20142 The court confirmed the judgment and decree dismissing both appeals, finding no merit in the plaintiffs' arguments. It upheld the legality of the auction sale, emphasizing the property's HUF status and the binding nature of the agreements. The court held that the suits were time-barred and lacked jurisdiction, as civil courts do not handle tax recovery matters unless fraud is alleged. The plaintiffs' failure to challenge the sale within the prescribed time led to the dismissal of their claims without costs awarded. en-us Tue, 14 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:42:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20142 The court confirmed the judgment and decree dismissing both appeals, finding no merit in the plaintiffs' arguments. It upheld the legality of the auction sale, emphasizing the property's HUF status and the binding nature of the agreements. The court held that the suits were time-barred and lacked jurisdiction, as civil courts do not handle tax recovery matters unless fraud is alleged. The plaintiffs' failure to challenge the sale within the prescribed time led to the dismissal of their claims without costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 14 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20142