https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387262 The Delhi High Court considered the constitutionality of challenged provisions, noting the binding nature of a Madras High Court decision on the matter. The court acknowledged the potential challenge of the Madras decision in the Supreme Court. Additionally, the Petitioner suggested empowering CESTAT for GST matters, proposing a streamlined approach. The case was adjourned for the Respondent's counsel to seek instructions. The judgment reflects a comprehensive analysis of legal issues and a practical approach to handling complexities in GST matters. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387262 The Delhi High Court considered the constitutionality of challenged provisions, noting the binding nature of a Madras High Court decision on the matter. The court acknowledged the potential challenge of the Madras decision in the Supreme Court. Additionally, the Petitioner suggested empowering CESTAT for GST matters, proposing a streamlined approach. The case was adjourned for the Respondent's counsel to seek instructions. The judgment reflects a comprehensive analysis of legal issues and a practical approach to handling complexities in GST matters. Case-Laws GST Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387262