https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283893 A separate suit may impeach an earlier decree for fraud or deliberate misrepresentation only if the pleading states specific particulars and the evidence proves them with reliability; bare allegations or a mere claim that the earlier case lacked legal merit are insufficient. Procedural complaints such as alleged denial of cross-examination or irregular conduct in the earlier proceedings do not by themselves furnish an independent basis to invalidate that decree in collateral proceedings. Where a later purchase is made pendente lite and the challenger cannot displace the earlier decree or prove superior title, declaratory relief for absolute ownership and for extinguishing the other side's redeemable right cannot be granted. en-us Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2019 17:03:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283893 A separate suit may impeach an earlier decree for fraud or deliberate misrepresentation only if the pleading states specific particulars and the evidence proves them with reliability; bare allegations or a mere claim that the earlier case lacked legal merit are insufficient. Procedural complaints such as alleged denial of cross-examination or irregular conduct in the earlier proceedings do not by themselves furnish an independent basis to invalidate that decree in collateral proceedings. Where a later purchase is made pendente lite and the challenger cannot displace the earlier decree or prove superior title, declaratory relief for absolute ownership and for extinguishing the other side's redeemable right cannot be granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283893