<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 729 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalty orders under Section 271F for non-compliance with a notice issued under Section 153A(a). It found the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction, followed natural justice principles, provided necessary documents, and imposed penalties within the time limit. The Tribunal rejected the argument of reasonable cause under Section 273B and dismissed all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 729 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalty orders under Section 271F for non-compliance with a notice issued under Section 153A(a). It found the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction, followed natural justice principles, provided necessary documents, and imposed penalties within the time limit. The Tribunal rejected the argument of reasonable cause under Section 273B and dismissed all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>