<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. It found no justification for assuming jurisdiction under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, as no incriminating material was found during the search. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the addition on account of unexplained investment lacked evidence and was based on presumption, ultimately quashing the proceedings and setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objections. It found no justification for assuming jurisdiction under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, as no incriminating material was found during the search. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the addition on account of unexplained investment lacked evidence and was based on presumption, ultimately quashing the proceedings and setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>