https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387229 The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order due to lack of jurisdiction by the ITO, Ward 7(2), Jaipur, as the original jurisdiction was with ITO, Ward-1, Hanumangarh. Consequently, other issues such as disallowance of brokerage expenses, deduction under Section 54F, and addition under Section 68 for undisclosed income were not further examined. The reassessment order was declared invalid, and the appeal was allowed on 17/09/2019. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387229 The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order due to lack of jurisdiction by the ITO, Ward 7(2), Jaipur, as the original jurisdiction was with ITO, Ward-1, Hanumangarh. Consequently, other issues such as disallowance of brokerage expenses, deduction under Section 54F, and addition under Section 68 for undisclosed income were not further examined. The reassessment order was declared invalid, and the appeal was allowed on 17/09/2019. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387229