<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20124</link>
    <description>Borrowed capital is excluded from the capital base for computing relief under section 80J because rule 19A(3) governs that computation, and the contrary claim fails. By contrast, processing prawns by cutting and packing them for shipment supported classification as an industrial company under section 2(8)(c) of the Finance Act, 1974. Export incentives were treated as receipts arising from the business and as industrial profit, while customs duty drawback also counted toward industrial profits because the duty had formed part of business expenditure. The document therefore states that industrial company status was available on the processing and profit-link issues, but not on the section 80J capital question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20124</link>
      <description>Borrowed capital is excluded from the capital base for computing relief under section 80J because rule 19A(3) governs that computation, and the contrary claim fails. By contrast, processing prawns by cutting and packing them for shipment supported classification as an industrial company under section 2(8)(c) of the Finance Act, 1974. Export incentives were treated as receipts arising from the business and as industrial profit, while customs duty drawback also counted toward industrial profits because the duty had formed part of business expenditure. The document therefore states that industrial company status was available on the processing and profit-link issues, but not on the section 80J capital question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>