<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387212</link>
    <description>Incomplete and unreliable laboratory testing could not displace the importer&#039;s claimed classification of the goods as natural calcite powder. Because the departmental report omitted a material parameter, particle size, and the available oil absorption value alone was insufficient to establish that the goods were precipitated calcium carbonate, the department&#039;s classification was not sustained. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that exemption cannot be denied on the basis of incomplete testing where the goods are not shown to fall outside the claimed tariff entry. The goods were treated as natural calcite powder, and the classification, duty demand, confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387212</link>
      <description>Incomplete and unreliable laboratory testing could not displace the importer&#039;s claimed classification of the goods as natural calcite powder. Because the departmental report omitted a material parameter, particle size, and the available oil absorption value alone was insufficient to establish that the goods were precipitated calcium carbonate, the department&#039;s classification was not sustained. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that exemption cannot be denied on the basis of incomplete testing where the goods are not shown to fall outside the claimed tariff entry. The goods were treated as natural calcite powder, and the classification, duty demand, confiscation and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>