https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283884 The court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge, quashed the relevant orders, and allowed the petition, holding that the State Government could recover losses by suing the appellant in court. The appeal and original petition were allowed, with the court finding that the respondents failed to follow prescribed procedures, invalidating their claims for damages and revenue recovery proceedings. The blacklisting order and forfeiture of the earnest money deposit were set aside, allowing the appellant to challenge liability quantification. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:35:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283884 The court set aside the judgment of the learned single Judge, quashed the relevant orders, and allowed the petition, holding that the State Government could recover losses by suing the appellant in court. The appeal and original petition were allowed, with the court finding that the respondents failed to follow prescribed procedures, invalidating their claims for damages and revenue recovery proceedings. The blacklisting order and forfeiture of the earnest money deposit were set aside, allowing the appellant to challenge liability quantification. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283884