<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1106 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283883</link>
    <description>The court held that an Executive Engineer could not unilaterally determine liability for breach of contract as it lacked impartiality. Emphasizing the need for an independent forum, the court quashed the assessments made by the Executive Engineer, citing legal principles against self-judgment in legal matters. The judgment clarified limitations on a party&#039;s authority in breach of contract scenarios, highlighting the importance of impartial adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1106 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283883</link>
      <description>The court held that an Executive Engineer could not unilaterally determine liability for breach of contract as it lacked impartiality. Emphasizing the need for an independent forum, the court quashed the assessments made by the Executive Engineer, citing legal principles against self-judgment in legal matters. The judgment clarified limitations on a party&#039;s authority in breach of contract scenarios, highlighting the importance of impartial adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>