<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20121</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for all issues except the deductibility of rent paid for rent-free accommodation, which was not pressed by the counsel. The court held that surtax liability, depreciation on research and development expenditure, and interest charged under section 215 of the Income-tax Act are not allowable deductions under specific sections of the Act, based on previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20121</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue for all issues except the deductibility of rent paid for rent-free accommodation, which was not pressed by the counsel. The court held that surtax liability, depreciation on research and development expenditure, and interest charged under section 215 of the Income-tax Act are not allowable deductions under specific sections of the Act, based on previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>