https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283881 Where the parties dispute whether the contract was fully worked out and whether payment was accepted in full and final settlement, the matter concerns the existence and extent of any further monetary claim and the effect of the alleged settlement. Such questions are properly for the arbitrator and do not justify treating the arbitration clause as inapplicable at the threshold. An application under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act was therefore not maintainable on these facts, and the disputes were held to be arbitrable. en-us Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:57:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283881 Where the parties dispute whether the contract was fully worked out and whether payment was accepted in full and final settlement, the matter concerns the existence and extent of any further monetary claim and the effect of the alleged settlement. Such questions are properly for the arbitrator and do not justify treating the arbitration clause as inapplicable at the threshold. An application under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act was therefore not maintainable on these facts, and the disputes were held to be arbitrable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283881