<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283880</link>
    <description>A dispute over whether a contract was discharged by accord and satisfaction was treated as arising from the contract itself and therefore falling within the arbitration agreement. The Supreme Court rejected the view that such a question could not be referred to arbitration and held that the matter, including the issue of accord and satisfaction, had to be sent to arbitration under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act. The arbitrator was to decide first whether accord and satisfaction existed and then proceed further only if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 292 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283880</link>
      <description>A dispute over whether a contract was discharged by accord and satisfaction was treated as arising from the contract itself and therefore falling within the arbitration agreement. The Supreme Court rejected the view that such a question could not be referred to arbitration and held that the matter, including the issue of accord and satisfaction, had to be sent to arbitration under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act. The arbitrator was to decide first whether accord and satisfaction existed and then proceed further only if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>