<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283871</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi examined two issues in an income-tax article note: first, additional evidence on the fair market value of agricultural land as on 01.04.1981 could be admitted because the assessee had not had adequate opportunity before the Assessing Officer, but the valuation certificate lacked a reliable evidentiary basis, so the adopted value was set aside and the matter remitted for reference under section 55A and fresh computation; second, exemption under section 54B was not available where the new agricultural land was purchased before receipt of the sale consideration from the original transfer, as the statutory investment condition was not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283871</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi examined two issues in an income-tax article note: first, additional evidence on the fair market value of agricultural land as on 01.04.1981 could be admitted because the assessee had not had adequate opportunity before the Assessing Officer, but the valuation certificate lacked a reliable evidentiary basis, so the adopted value was set aside and the matter remitted for reference under section 55A and fresh computation; second, exemption under section 54B was not available where the new agricultural land was purchased before receipt of the sale consideration from the original transfer, as the statutory investment condition was not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>