<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283870</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08 due to the non-speaking order issued by the D.R.P. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a detailed and reasoned decision by the D.R.P. in transfer pricing disputes. The matter was remanded back to the D.R.P. for a comprehensive review and decision based on the contentions raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283870</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08 due to the non-speaking order issued by the D.R.P. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of a detailed and reasoned decision by the D.R.P. in transfer pricing disputes. The matter was remanded back to the D.R.P. for a comprehensive review and decision based on the contentions raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>