<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, determining that the notional income from unsold units held as stock-in-trade should be classified as business income rather than taxed under &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The Tribunal overturned the A.O&#039;s additions for A.Y. 2013-14 and A.Y. 2014-15, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The decision was pronounced on 26.04.2019 for ITA No. 282/Mum/2018 and ITA No. 283/Mum/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1766 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, determining that the notional income from unsold units held as stock-in-trade should be classified as business income rather than taxed under &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The Tribunal overturned the A.O&#039;s additions for A.Y. 2013-14 and A.Y. 2014-15, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The decision was pronounced on 26.04.2019 for ITA No. 282/Mum/2018 and ITA No. 283/Mum/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>