<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283874</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning transfer pricing adjustments, directing the exclusion of five comparables due to functional dissimilarity and lack of segmental information. The decision highlighted the significance of functional comparability and the impact of extraordinary events and brand value on comparable selection. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper comparables in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283874</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning transfer pricing adjustments, directing the exclusion of five comparables due to functional dissimilarity and lack of segmental information. The decision highlighted the significance of functional comparability and the impact of extraordinary events and brand value on comparable selection. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper comparables in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>