<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387201</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit of service tax paid on sales commission was held admissible where the agency&#039;s functions extended beyond mere procurement and included sales promotion activities such as trial samples, advertising, travel, discounts, gifts and exhibitions. The Tribunal treated the arrangement as sales promotion rather than a bare commission contract, and held that audit objection alone, without contrary evidence, was insufficient to deny credit. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387201</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit of service tax paid on sales commission was held admissible where the agency&#039;s functions extended beyond mere procurement and included sales promotion activities such as trial samples, advertising, travel, discounts, gifts and exhibitions. The Tribunal treated the arrangement as sales promotion rather than a bare commission contract, and held that audit objection alone, without contrary evidence, was insufficient to deny credit. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>