https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387195 The appellant was found to have wrongly taken cenvat credit based on allegedly fabricated invoices. Despite arguments regarding the authenticity of the invoices and the timeliness of the show cause notice, the appeal challenging the recovery of the credit was rejected due to discrepancies and lack of supporting documents. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further adjudication, directing the appellant to produce the RG23A Register and other relevant records within 15 days for a fresh review of the cenvat credit issue, penalties, and the show cause notice timeline. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2019 07:56:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387195 The appellant was found to have wrongly taken cenvat credit based on allegedly fabricated invoices. Despite arguments regarding the authenticity of the invoices and the timeliness of the show cause notice, the appeal challenging the recovery of the credit was rejected due to discrepancies and lack of supporting documents. The Tribunal remanded the matter for further adjudication, directing the appellant to produce the RG23A Register and other relevant records within 15 days for a fresh review of the cenvat credit issue, penalties, and the show cause notice timeline. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387195