<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387189</link>
    <description>Punitive sealing, suspension or cancellation of a liquor licence must comply with natural justice, including prior notice and an opportunity to respond. Where closure was unlawful or effected without due process, the licensee was entitled to a proportionate refund of licence fee and related differential amounts for the period of unlawful closure. By contrast, refund was not available where the closure followed proved breaches of tender or licence conditions and the record showed that show-cause notices were issued and explanations considered. The principle applied is that refund is confined to periods of closure not attributable to the licensee&#039;s proven default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 07:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387189</link>
      <description>Punitive sealing, suspension or cancellation of a liquor licence must comply with natural justice, including prior notice and an opportunity to respond. Where closure was unlawful or effected without due process, the licensee was entitled to a proportionate refund of licence fee and related differential amounts for the period of unlawful closure. By contrast, refund was not available where the closure followed proved breaches of tender or licence conditions and the record showed that show-cause notices were issued and explanations considered. The principle applied is that refund is confined to periods of closure not attributable to the licensee&#039;s proven default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>