<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>FOR PRIOR PERIOD ITEMS REVENUE SHOULD CONSIDER GROUND REALITIES AND WORK OBJECTIVELY WITH RESULT ORIENTATION IN MIND TO AVOID COSTLY, WASTEFUL LITIGATION Honorable FM and CBDT are requested to issue guidelines.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8784</link>
    <description>IPP are incomes or expenses attributable to periods before the accounting period and commonly arise from conservative estimates, late claims, contingencies resolving, or reclassification on factual ascertainment. The author urges that where IPP are accounted for in the current year and are immaterial, tax authorities should accept them in the year of accounting and avoid reassessment or disallowance that merely shifts recognition between years. Guidance is proposed to limit enquiries to substantial cases and to adopt a materiality threshold for non-action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 07:05:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 07:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>FOR PRIOR PERIOD ITEMS REVENUE SHOULD CONSIDER GROUND REALITIES AND WORK OBJECTIVELY WITH RESULT ORIENTATION IN MIND TO AVOID COSTLY, WASTEFUL LITIGATION Honorable FM and CBDT are requested to issue guidelines.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8784</link>
      <description>IPP are incomes or expenses attributable to periods before the accounting period and commonly arise from conservative estimates, late claims, contingencies resolving, or reclassification on factual ascertainment. The author urges that where IPP are accounted for in the current year and are immaterial, tax authorities should accept them in the year of accounting and avoid reassessment or disallowance that merely shifts recognition between years. Guidance is proposed to limit enquiries to substantial cases and to adopt a materiality threshold for non-action.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 07:05:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>