<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387181</link>
    <description>The court found the order of confiscation of goods and conveyance under section 130 of the CGST Act to be invalid due to violations of natural justice principles and lack of reasoning. The court quashed the order, directing a fresh decision by affording the petitioner a fair hearing. The conveyance and goods were ordered to be released pending further proceedings under section 130 of the CGST Act. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387181</link>
      <description>The court found the order of confiscation of goods and conveyance under section 130 of the CGST Act to be invalid due to violations of natural justice principles and lack of reasoning. The court quashed the order, directing a fresh decision by affording the petitioner a fair hearing. The conveyance and goods were ordered to be released pending further proceedings under section 130 of the CGST Act. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>