<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 642 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387158</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the order dated 25.11.2016, due to exceeding the reasonable limitation period for issuing the show cause notice, absence of a mechanism to demand duty drawback, and lack of authority to reassess the value of goods already exported. The judgment aligned with established principles and interpretations, emphasizing that the Respondent lacked power for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 642 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387158</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the order dated 25.11.2016, due to exceeding the reasonable limitation period for issuing the show cause notice, absence of a mechanism to demand duty drawback, and lack of authority to reassess the value of goods already exported. The judgment aligned with established principles and interpretations, emphasizing that the Respondent lacked power for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>