<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 631 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387147</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal. The appellant failed to prove the creditworthiness of the foreign investing company, resulting in the addition of share application money under section 68 of the IT Act. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantiating creditworthiness and investment reasons to avoid unexplained cash credit implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 07:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 631 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387147</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal. The appellant failed to prove the creditworthiness of the foreign investing company, resulting in the addition of share application money under section 68 of the IT Act. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantiating creditworthiness and investment reasons to avoid unexplained cash credit implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>