<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 56 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20103</link>
    <description>A revisional order made while the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 was in force gave the assessee an accrued procedural right to seek a reference under section 60, and that remedy was preserved by the savings clause in section 99(1) of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1991. The repeal did not extinguish rights already accrued or liabilities incurred under the earlier Act, and the deeming provision could not override that saving effect absent a clear legislative intention to do so. The assessee&#039;s proper remedy therefore remained a reference under the 1950 Act, and the order rejecting the reference application as not maintainable was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 56 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20103</link>
      <description>A revisional order made while the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 was in force gave the assessee an accrued procedural right to seek a reference under section 60, and that remedy was preserved by the savings clause in section 99(1) of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1991. The repeal did not extinguish rights already accrued or liabilities incurred under the earlier Act, and the deeming provision could not override that saving effect absent a clear legislative intention to do so. The assessee&#039;s proper remedy therefore remained a reference under the 1950 Act, and the order rejecting the reference application as not maintainable was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>