https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387128 The court, presided over by Justice Harsha Devani, addressed the petitioner's concerns about potential arrest under sections 69 and 132(5) of the CGST Act. The court issued a notice returnable on a specified date and granted ad interim relief to prevent any arrest during the petitioner's appearance before the second respondent authority. This decision aimed to balance the petitioner's apprehensions with the legal process requirements, ensuring temporary protection from arrest while fulfilling the obligation to appear. The directive for direct service of the order facilitated prompt communication and compliance with the relief granted, showcasing the court's proactive and responsive approach in addressing the petitioner's concerns. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387128 The court, presided over by Justice Harsha Devani, addressed the petitioner's concerns about potential arrest under sections 69 and 132(5) of the CGST Act. The court issued a notice returnable on a specified date and granted ad interim relief to prevent any arrest during the petitioner's appearance before the second respondent authority. This decision aimed to balance the petitioner's apprehensions with the legal process requirements, ensuring temporary protection from arrest while fulfilling the obligation to appear. The directive for direct service of the order facilitated prompt communication and compliance with the relief granted, showcasing the court's proactive and responsive approach in addressing the petitioner's concerns. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387128