<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 598 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387114</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner company to re-export &#039;Uncut Diamonds&#039; confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962, upon payment of a redemption fine and penalty. The court found that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction in directing confiscation and permitted the re-export based on the Kimberly Process Certificate. The petitioner was directed to pay the fines under protest, with the right to challenge them before the appellate authority. The judgment ensured timely filing of an appeal to contest the penalties, ultimately granting permission for re-export while preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 598 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387114</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner company to re-export &#039;Uncut Diamonds&#039; confiscated under the Customs Act, 1962, upon payment of a redemption fine and penalty. The court found that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction in directing confiscation and permitted the re-export based on the Kimberly Process Certificate. The petitioner was directed to pay the fines under protest, with the right to challenge them before the appellate authority. The judgment ensured timely filing of an appeal to contest the penalties, ultimately granting permission for re-export while preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>