<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 589 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387105</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and reinstated the original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision in a case involving incorrect payment of service tax under the wrong Service Tax Registration No. The Tribunal granted consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing that the payment of service tax was not in dispute, and the confirmation by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 589 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387105</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and reinstated the original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision in a case involving incorrect payment of service tax under the wrong Service Tax Registration No. The Tribunal granted consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing that the payment of service tax was not in dispute, and the confirmation by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>