<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283831</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to assess rental income under &quot;Income from business&quot; instead of &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The ITAT upheld the deletion of disallowed expenses incurred for maintaining business assets, emphasizing they were normal business expenditures. The judgment was rendered on November 13, 2017, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283831</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to assess rental income under &quot;Income from business&quot; instead of &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The ITAT upheld the deletion of disallowed expenses incurred for maintaining business assets, emphasizing they were normal business expenditures. The judgment was rendered on November 13, 2017, with detailed reasoning provided for each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>