<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283844</link>
    <description>The Court condoned the delay in re-filing appeals and allowed them subject to all just exceptions. It upheld the exclusion of four comparables for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions, finding the exclusion justified based on the scale of their operations. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, as no substantial question of law arose from the exclusion of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283844</link>
      <description>The Court condoned the delay in re-filing appeals and allowed them subject to all just exceptions. It upheld the exclusion of four comparables for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of international transactions, finding the exclusion justified based on the scale of their operations. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, as no substantial question of law arose from the exclusion of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>