<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1701 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283839</link>
    <description>CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 increased the monetary limit for departmental appeals before the Tribunal to Rs. 20 lakhs and clarified that the revised limit applies retrospectively to pending appeals. Because the tax effect in the present appeal was below that threshold, and the departmental representative ed the circular&#039;s applicability, the appeal was treated as not fit for adjudication on merits and was dismissed for low tax effect. The underlying legal issue was left open for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1701 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283839</link>
      <description>CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 increased the monetary limit for departmental appeals before the Tribunal to Rs. 20 lakhs and clarified that the revised limit applies retrospectively to pending appeals. Because the tax effect in the present appeal was below that threshold, and the departmental representative ed the circular&#039;s applicability, the appeal was treated as not fit for adjudication on merits and was dismissed for low tax effect. The underlying legal issue was left open for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>