<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1764 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition of unexplained cash credit under section 68, considering precedents, allowing the assessee to present their case. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed solely for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal restoring the issue for fresh adjudication in light of recent judicial decisions on sham transactions involving paper companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1764 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition of unexplained cash credit under section 68, considering precedents, allowing the assessee to present their case. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed solely for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal restoring the issue for fresh adjudication in light of recent judicial decisions on sham transactions involving paper companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>