<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1710 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283845</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny permission for the petitioner to travel abroad due to pending charge memos. The Court emphasized the importance of vigilance clearance in departmental functioning and declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1710 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283845</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision to deny permission for the petitioner to travel abroad due to pending charge memos. The Court emphasized the importance of vigilance clearance in departmental functioning and declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>