https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387088 The Authority rejected the applicant's claim that Portfolio Management Services provided to Non-resident clients paying fees in foreign currency should be zero-rated for GST purposes. The Authority determined that the question regarding the place of supply did not meet the criteria specified in the relevant Acts for seeking an advance ruling, leading to the rejection of the application. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387088 The Authority rejected the applicant's claim that Portfolio Management Services provided to Non-resident clients paying fees in foreign currency should be zero-rated for GST purposes. The Authority determined that the question regarding the place of supply did not meet the criteria specified in the relevant Acts for seeking an advance ruling, leading to the rejection of the application. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387088