<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 533 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387049</link>
    <description>Education cess and higher education cess were treated as part of duty for the purpose of Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002, so the refund entitlement depended on that inclusion. Applying the binding view already taken on the issue, the cesses were held refundable under the notification. The refund claim was therefore allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 533 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387049</link>
      <description>Education cess and higher education cess were treated as part of duty for the purpose of Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002, so the refund entitlement depended on that inclusion. Applying the binding view already taken on the issue, the cesses were held refundable under the notification. The refund claim was therefore allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>