<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (3) TMI 31 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283828</link>
    <description>An appellate authority exercising judicial or quasi-judicial power affecting civil rights must observe natural justice unless expressly excluded, so a person whose substantive position is to be altered must be heard before adverse evidence is taken or a contrary finding is recorded. Under the income-tax scheme discussed, notice and inquiry were required before a partition finding could be displaced, and the appellate authority could not validly reverse the assessment of a family member as an individual without hearing him. An order made behind the affected party&#039;s back was treated as invalid in law, and the assessment founded on that order could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (3) TMI 31 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283828</link>
      <description>An appellate authority exercising judicial or quasi-judicial power affecting civil rights must observe natural justice unless expressly excluded, so a person whose substantive position is to be altered must be heard before adverse evidence is taken or a contrary finding is recorded. Under the income-tax scheme discussed, notice and inquiry were required before a partition finding could be displaced, and the appellate authority could not validly reverse the assessment of a family member as an individual without hearing him. An order made behind the affected party&#039;s back was treated as invalid in law, and the assessment founded on that order could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>