<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283824</link>
    <description>The appellants successfully challenged the penalty imposition and service tax calculation in a case involving a switch in service classification. The Tribunal found the switch was made in good faith without any fraudulent intent, leading to the penalty being set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the entire consideration received should be treated as cum duty for service tax calculation, benefiting the appellants. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, directing lower authorities to recalculate the service tax amount with the cum-tax benefit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283824</link>
      <description>The appellants successfully challenged the penalty imposition and service tax calculation in a case involving a switch in service classification. The Tribunal found the switch was made in good faith without any fraudulent intent, leading to the penalty being set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the entire consideration received should be treated as cum duty for service tax calculation, benefiting the appellants. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, directing lower authorities to recalculate the service tax amount with the cum-tax benefit, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>