<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 10 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20079</link>
    <description>The article explains that a Hindu ruler&#039;s estate will be governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 unless it clearly falls within the narrow exception for succession to a single heir under a covenant, agreement, or pre-commencement enactment. On the facts discussed, the Gwalior estate was treated as family property rather than impartible property, because the evidence did not establish a valid custom or grant creating primogeniture or exclusive succession. The consequence was that the estate was assessable as Hindu undivided family property, and the administrator&#039;s partial distribution of assets was treated as valid as a consequence of that characterisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 10 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20079</link>
      <description>The article explains that a Hindu ruler&#039;s estate will be governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 unless it clearly falls within the narrow exception for succession to a single heir under a covenant, agreement, or pre-commencement enactment. On the facts discussed, the Gwalior estate was treated as family property rather than impartible property, because the evidence did not establish a valid custom or grant creating primogeniture or exclusive succession. The consequence was that the estate was assessable as Hindu undivided family property, and the administrator&#039;s partial distribution of assets was treated as valid as a consequence of that characterisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>