<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 518 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to revise the assessment order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the assessee&#039;s claims of timely purchase and installation of a solar power system for business purposes, the lack of concrete evidence led to the dismissal of their appeal for the assessment year 2013-14. The judgment was delivered on 11th October 2019, with the assessee&#039;s absence at the hearing impacting the outcome in favor of the tax authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 518 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision to revise the assessment order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the assessee&#039;s claims of timely purchase and installation of a solar power system for business purposes, the lack of concrete evidence led to the dismissal of their appeal for the assessment year 2013-14. The judgment was delivered on 11th October 2019, with the assessee&#039;s absence at the hearing impacting the outcome in favor of the tax authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>