<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 514 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387030</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions made by the Assessing Officer and partially sustained by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific findings to support disallowances, stating that expenses were legitimate business expenditures. The disallowances were deleted, and the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 514 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387030</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions made by the Assessing Officer and partially sustained by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific findings to support disallowances, stating that expenses were legitimate business expenditures. The disallowances were deleted, and the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>