<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 507 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387023</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking the release of seized gold chains, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be addressed by the appellate authority under the Customs Act. The Court highlighted the provisions allowing for confiscation and penalties under the Act, advising the petitioner to challenge the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order before the appropriate appellate body for independent review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 507 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387023</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking the release of seized gold chains, emphasizing that disputed factual issues should be addressed by the appellate authority under the Customs Act. The Court highlighted the provisions allowing for confiscation and penalties under the Act, advising the petitioner to challenge the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order before the appropriate appellate body for independent review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>