<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387022</link>
    <description>The Court refused to grant a long adjournment, emphasizing the importance of tax certainty for businesses. It noted the burden on trade due to the Social Welfare Surcharge when basic duty is exempt and granted the Respondents 4 weeks to file an affidavit in reply. The Court adjourned the Petitions for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387022</link>
      <description>The Court refused to grant a long adjournment, emphasizing the importance of tax certainty for businesses. It noted the burden on trade due to the Social Welfare Surcharge when basic duty is exempt and granted the Respondents 4 weeks to file an affidavit in reply. The Court adjourned the Petitions for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>