<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SPECIAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Corporate Debtor was obligated to pay Maturity Premium to the Financial Creditor even before the maturity period completion, as agreed in the debenture agreement. The Resolution Professional was directed to include the Maturity Premium in the claim. However, the Tribunal clarified that Default Interest could only be claimed on defaulted amounts, leading to the rejection of part of the Default Interest claim. The decision underscored the importance of upholding contractual obligations and ruled in favor of the Financial Creditor regarding the entitlement to Maturity Premium and a portion of Default Interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SPECIAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Corporate Debtor was obligated to pay Maturity Premium to the Financial Creditor even before the maturity period completion, as agreed in the debenture agreement. The Resolution Professional was directed to include the Maturity Premium in the claim. However, the Tribunal clarified that Default Interest could only be claimed on defaulted amounts, leading to the rejection of part of the Default Interest claim. The decision underscored the importance of upholding contractual obligations and ruled in favor of the Financial Creditor regarding the entitlement to Maturity Premium and a portion of Default Interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>