<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 46 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20074</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the term &quot;assessee&quot; in section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act pertained solely to living individuals and did not include Hindu undivided families. Consequently, the benefit of exemption for capital gains on property sales was denied to the Hindu undivided family, aligning with previous interpretations by various High Courts. The judgment favored the Revenue in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 46 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20074</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the term &quot;assessee&quot; in section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act pertained solely to living individuals and did not include Hindu undivided families. Consequently, the benefit of exemption for capital gains on property sales was denied to the Hindu undivided family, aligning with previous interpretations by various High Courts. The judgment favored the Revenue in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>