<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the income received for assisting customers with vehicle registration at the RTO did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service and was not taxable under service tax. Citing precedent from a similar case, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability for RTO registration fees and penalties, ultimately allowing the appeal and disposing of the stay petition on 17/09/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the income received for assisting customers with vehicle registration at the RTO did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service and was not taxable under service tax. Citing precedent from a similar case, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability for RTO registration fees and penalties, ultimately allowing the appeal and disposing of the stay petition on 17/09/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>